Take heed to them, Flickcharters of the evening! What rating they make! Sure, it’s that day once more: the ninth annual Halloween Flickchart Horror Franchise rating is right here.
Final yr we started a sub-project of working by means of all the traditional Common horror franchises, beginning with the Wolf Man movies. This yr, we flip to arguably essentially the most well-known and iconic determine in all of horror literature and horror cinema: Depend Dracula! Vampire fiction stands proper alongside zombie fiction as some of the visited horror subgenres, and the blood-drinking aristocrats of the monster world have had a number of surges of recognition all through the many years, resulting in numerous takes on the fabric from Anne Rice to Stephen King to True Blood, Twilight, and The Vampire Diaries.
Nevertheless it all actually begins with Dracula. Whereas probably not the primary vampire (the idea traces again into the folklore and mythology of a number of cultures), it was Bram Stoker’s novel that served because the definitive work and centralized the lore in a extensively accessible format, much like how J.R.R. Tolkien would outline western fantasy together with his famed The Lord of the Rings. Stoker’s titular Depend moved vampires from purely monstrous to one thing extra sophisticated. Depend Dracula is a refined man of tradition, with a gentlemanly suave making him alluring and sultry.
It’s this attribute, above the concern of crosses, working water, and the necessity to drink blood and sleep in coffins that really formed vampires within the collective aware. This dichotomy of lustful attract and monstrous needs has run by means of most vampire fiction ever since.
Whereas there are actually 100 totally different movies that includes Dracula on Flickchart, this text will confine itself to these produced by Common. A future definitive rating of all Dracula movies might come sometime, however that might be outdoors the scope of this Common challenge. For the primary time we should function a number of repeat movies, as Dracula appeared alongside the Wolf Man in some movies from The Wolf Man rating.
9. Van Helsing (2004)
Whereas the Marvel Cinematic Universe has turn out to be the go-to definition of a cinematic universe, Common beat them to the punch by many many years. Although the early iterations had a unfastened definition of canon, they had been nonetheless crossing their monsters over. However even earlier than the MCU, Common had schemes of reigniting the shared monster idea, and it culminated in Van Helsing.
Banking on Hugh Jackman‘s star energy on the time, the movie takes the motion strategy by turning the famed vampire hunter from Stoker’s novel right into a grumpy but wise-cracking hero who has to staff up with Kate Beckinsale and David Wenham to tackle the evil schemes of Depend Dracula. That includes Frankenstein’s monster as an essential plot level, in addition to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Van Helsing seeks to channel the shared monster vitality of yesteryear.
Sadly, director and author Stephen Sommers turned in a sloppy work. With a generic script, horrible results, and an general lack of expertise about why the Common monster movies work, Van Helsing is a drag. Helsing will get naked characterization, seemingly written as an amnesiac just because Jackman’s Wolverine was one, and there’s an completely unsatisfying decision to that thriller. Jackman is charismatic sufficient, however even he can do little with this paltry materials. Kate Beckinsale appears simply as misplaced, and Wenham tries to channel an Igor-like sense of goofy humor because the Q to Helsing’s Bond, however is generally unmemorable.
The introduction sequence of the movie is a enjoyable throwback to the ending of Frankenstein, however that’s about the place the enjoyable ends. The motion is generic, Richard Roxburgh‘s Dracula is forgettable, and the plot and characters depart little so that you can sink your enamel into. Not one of the foreboding sense of horror is on this film, and it’s best left forgotten as a relic of its period.
- International Rating: #6,616
- 20/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 25% of its matchups
- 4261 customers have it of their prime 20
8. Dracula Untold (2014)
Seemingly not glad with the failure of Van Helsing, Common tried once more to reboot the Common monsters as a shared universe. This time, it adopted on the success of the MCU. However as soon as once more, they did not seize the viewers creativeness. Common truly removed the shared universe connections in Dracula Untold earlier than launch, considering they might do higher with The Mummy (spoiler: they didn’t).
Dracula Untold is yet one more generic motion movie bereft of any compelling components or any understanding of why Common monster movies work. This one goals to be an origin story for Depend Dracula, casting Luke Evans as Vlad “the Impaler” Dracula and making him a noble hero who takes on vampirism as a option to save his folks from the evil invading power that’s the Ottomans. There are actually no plot twists or turns previous that. That single sentence so totally describes every part that occurs that it’s merely unhappy.
The script makes an attempt to have some inner conflicts for Dracula within the type of being tempted by his darkish powers and having a seeming brotherhood with the Ottoman chief, performed in a hilariously over-the-top flip by Dominic Cooper (who additionally seems to be scarily like Evans). However neither of those components are significantly compelling. Cooper is barely within the movie, and there isn’t any actual temptation for Dracula due to how damned noble the movie makes him. Every part he does is written to be so clearly justified that it doesn’t really feel like significant battle within the slightest.
The movie additionally fails as an motion story. The concept of a robust vampire mowing down troopers like Dynasty Warriors doesn’t appear to be an concept fully bereft of potential. However the filmmakers couldn’t appear to consider something previous having him continuously flip right into a swarm of CGI bats and punch folks. The motion scenes get boring in a short time and really feel low-effort. Since these are imagined to be the centerpieces of an motion movie, their failure shortly pulls your complete factor down.
This one will get gentle bonus factors for the obscure makes an attempt at historicity and letting Charles Dance lend his gravitas to the unique vampire that cursed Dracula. At the very least it isn’t as horrendously silly as Van Helsing, however it commits the sin of being extraordinarily bland. It lacks intriguing photographs, memorable battles, or depthful characters. And as soon as once more, it isn’t scary. Attempting to make a Marvelized model of a horror character simply looks as if a unsuitable strategy.
- International Rating: #13,705
- 37/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 38% of its matchups
- 5 customers have it of their prime 20
7. Home of Frankenstein (1944)
We reviewed this movie in The Wolf Man rating and have largely the identical ideas this time round. Whereas it needs to boast that it’s the primary main crossover movie for Common, it so totally separates the parts that includes every monster in order to really feel like two totally different movies mashed collectively. Your entire first half of the movie is the one portion to function Dracula, and he’s resurrected and vanquished earlier than Frankenstein ever walks throughout the display screen.
Examined as a Dracula movie, it’s a moderately bland outing for the Depend. A mad scientist breaks freed from jail and recruits a hunchback to assist him, they usually simply occur to bump into a touring showman who by some means has the corpse of Dracula. They kill the showman, revive Dracula, and try and bend Dracula to their will. John Carradine‘s first go because the well-known Depend has not one of the gravitas of Bela Lugosi, and he truthfully isn’t given a lot to do. The movie additionally has his destruction happen purely as a result of Dracula forgets to get out of the solar in time, making the Depend appear like a idiot.
Other than the occasional neat shot right here and there, and Lon Chaney‘s presence as Larry, Home of Frankenstein is basically a drag of a film. On condition that Common needed to piece this collectively in a haphazard method, it’s not stunning that it merely doesn’t work. Whereas it truly has some first rate photographs, not like the 2 extra trendy movies, it isn’t actually any much less bland than the 2 movies beneath it.
- International Rating: #4,100
- 14/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 40% of its matchups
- 7 customers have it of their prime 20
6. Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948)
The comedy hijinks of Abbott and Costello don’t appear essentially the most pure match for horrific monsters, however they had been beneath contract with Common, and utilizing all the studio’s property to make cash gave the impression to be Common’s precedence even again within the 40s. Abbott and Costello famously hated the idea, and it made the manufacturing fairly troubled. Nonetheless, this was one of many highest-grossing movies in your complete Common roster and it appeared to click on for folks.
The satirical parody appears to overly mock Common’s personal monsters to some extent the place one wonders what the purpose is meant to be. Abbott and Costello handle some humorous moments right here and there, and the script has some good jokes. But your complete movie is so goofy in tone that it feels low stakes and missing in consequence.
So far as Dracula goes, that is the one time Bela Lugosi ever formally reprised his position. Like within the different crossover movies, Dracula is used because the schemer, manipulating the opposite monsters and people to perform his obscure ends of ruling the world or some such. It’s enjoyable to see Lugosi again within the position, and he’s by no means requested to do something too overly comical, not like The Wolf Man and Frankenstein. For followers of Dracula, this movie in all probability does the least harm to his character.
The movie is humorous sufficient that it isn’t fully a slog. It has the potential of being one thing iconic in its personal method. However Abbott and Costello’s resistance to the topic and a script that doesn’t get as sharp and wry because it may maintain this movie again, even when it does give us one final good hurrah for Lugosi’s Dracula.
- International Rating: #1,372
- 5/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 33% of its matchups
- 42 customers have it of their prime 20
5. Son of Dracula (1943)
In contrast to a lot of the different Common monsters, Dracula by no means actually acquired direct sequels. Dracula doesn’t present up within the two official follow-ups to the unique movie, no less than indirectly. In that method, Dracula‘s sequels are maybe essentially the most intriguing of the bunch. Son of Dracula is the second sequel. Directed by Robert Siodmak, it options Lon Chaney Jr. of all folks as Depend Alucard, this movie’s model of the vampiric depend. Lengthy earlier than Castlevania, this movie requested you take a look at what the title spells backwards.
Among the many extra fascinating selections, Son of Dracula is about within the southern United States and follows Katherine Caldwell as an heiress to a Louisiana plantation. She has been secretly relationship Depend Alucard and invitations him to the USA and marries him the place he appears to shortly take over her life. Makes an attempt by Katherine’s ex-boyfriend to kill him fail and it appears his energy is absolute.
Whereas the movie appears to bear the everyday discovery of the vampire and hunt him down plotline, Son of Dracula provides a few intrigues to the script and takes the story in some surprising instructions. Mixed with Siodmak truly having some visible aptitude, Son of Dracula seems to be a reasonably intriguing movie. Chaney doesn’t fairly have the grandeur that Lugosi has, however his personal strengths as an actor render Depend Alucard into an fascinating character. And Siodmak, who would go on to direct some notable movies noir, demonstrates his mastery of the digital camera with some putting visuals.
There are points of Son of Dracula which might be goofy and melodramatic. Such is the battle when you’ve actors of various abilities in these movies. However given how poorly a few of these movies are made, Son of Dracula stands out for its moody atmospheric moments and never unhealthy particular results. With some tweaks, this might need surpassed even the unique.
- International Rating: #7,520
- 25/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 37% of its matchups
- 1 person has it of their prime 20
4. Home of Dracula (1945)
The second Home movie stays the higher one. Mashing up all the Common creatures once more, Home of Dracula is a semi-sequel to Home of Frankenstein, although is probably the closest movie as to really following the occasions of the earlier movie. This one is titled options the titular Depend as way more of a driving power than in Home of Frankenstein. John Carradine returns within the position and provides his greatest efficiency, if once more not as iconic as Lugosi’s.
Whereas as soon as once more centering on a mad scientist’s interactions with the corporate of Common monsters, Dracula’s power of will turns into a significant function… as does his stunning need to be cured of vampirism. If there’s something this movie does properly, it’s demonstrating how all the varied situations of the creatures are curses that they need to be rid of. Dracula clashes with the physician, who instantly searches for a option to destroy Dracula, which fuels the movie’s drama.
Director Erle C. Kenton makes this movie distinct on account of its robust Val Lewton-inspired pictures and sense of ethical battle. This can be a movie that understands the darkness of monstrosity and represents it within the visuals of the movie and within the conflicts every character faces. This strategy is damage by the truth that not one of the characters have significantly compelling characterization, and Dracula’s personal need for a treatment is barely explored. However that the movie makes such overtures in any respect makes it extra compelling than many chunks of the Common catalogue. That is the closest Common bought to doing the mashup film proper.
- International Rating: #3,889
- 12/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 40% of its matchups
- 1 person has it of their prime 20
3. Dracula’s Daughter (1936)
With Dracula‘s success, and that of Bride of Frankenstein, Common started to understand that its troop of monsters could possibly be fairly profitable. Sequels may hold the cash flowing. Common due to this fact rushed into manufacturing a sequel to Dracula, although the titular Depend’s demise on the finish of the primary movie introduced an issue. What adopted was an advanced rights battle for a chapter faraway from the Stoker novel to make use of as an adaptation.
Mockingly, regardless of this enormous rights battle, trendy scholarship finds that the movie bears little resemblance to that chapter, and extra to the novel Carmilla, one of many first British works to cope with a lesbian relationship. And certainly, the lesbian undertones of Dracula’s Daughter have fueled a lot of the scholarship on this movie within the many years since its launch, moderately than its content material as a follow-up to Dracula.
On the floor degree, the movie follows Countess Marya Zaleska, a daughter of Dracula and vampire herself who seeks to be freed from her father’s affect; even from demise he appears in a position to power her into darkness. Edward Van Sloan returns as Van Helsing, renamed as Von Helsing for no clear motive. Funnily, he begins the movie beneath arrest and should attempt to persuade the policemen that he simply slayed a vampiric depend moderately than a rich baron and his servant.
The plotting from there’s considerably naked, as Von Helsing is shoved apart in favor of the Countess’s makes an attempt to treatment herself of vampirism or to beat the temptations of feasting on blood. However the movie has attracted consideration due to director Lambert Hillyer‘s course and selections that contain Dracula’s daughter taking a younger girl beneath her wing and finally succumbing to her need to feast upon her. One can guess the purpose of this metaphorical storytelling, particularly when wanting on the method Hillyer frames the photographs.
This isn’t only a post-release studying, both. The Manufacturing Code Administration seen it throughout manufacturing and made notes about particular dealing with of the scenes to keep away from questionable implications. Opinions had been cut up between those that seen the undertones and condemned them, those that didn’t discover, and people debating whether or not the movie is pro- or anti-lesbian.
None of this might actually matter if the movie wasn’t shot properly, and by chance the ability of those sequences and Gloria Holden‘s efficiency makes all of it work. Regardless of the tasteless seek for a treatment that leads in the direction of little, it’s the implications of the plot and the imagery that basically makes this movie tick. Whereas these hoping for extra of the particular Depend will likely be dissatisfied, one can credit score this for being a genuinely artistic sequel and an try and do one thing totally different.
This movie virtually acquired a remake, as this yr’s Abigail started improvement as one. Started is the important thing phrase, as anybody who has seen Abigail is aware of that it bears basically no resemblance to Dracula’s Daughter. Its legacy stays its personal.
- International Rating: #4,164
- 16/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 38% of its matchups
- 6 customers have it of their prime 20
Whereas not the primary monster movie produced by Common, Dracula is actually the primary one that may be credited for being actually iconic, and it was arguably the beginning of the fashionable horror style in movie. Director Tod Browning first made his foray into sound photos two years earlier, which led to his relationship with Bela Lugosi. The manufacturing of their earlier movie was troubled by a few of Browning’s odd selections, however it could be these odd selections that bought Browning taken with producing an adaptation of the Stoker’s famed story.
Nonetheless, there have been a number of curious detours alongside the way in which. First, this movie just isn’t a direct adaptation of the novel, however moderately of a stage adaptation. Rights points made immediately adapting Stoker’s novel troublesome. Additional, Lon Chaney (senior) was initially solid as Dracula, and it was solely his demise from lung most cancers that prevented him from showing within the position. Because of Lugosi taking part in the half on stage for years, he was the clear subsequent selection. Whereas unhappy for Chaney, it opened the way in which for what’s the most iconic horror efficiency of all time.
Lugosi’s tackle the Depend continues to be the movie’s defining function. He embraced the movie’s willingness to intensify his and the character’s Jap European-ness. His supply of Stoker’s iconic dialogue instantly left an impression, one that also lingers within the mind of individuals almost 100 years later. From his facial expressions to physique language and fierce nature, he nonetheless defines the character.
Regardless of the long-lasting nature of the position, Dracula is not any masterpiece of a movie. Maybe on account of Browning’s reported lack of enthusiasm for the challenge following Chaney’s demise, the storytelling of Dracula can really feel a bit inert. It offers a rushed rendering of the novel’s plot, combining characters in an unsatisfactory method and changing into greater than a bit staid after Dracula reaches England. Many scenes are shot at huge angles and have actors standing round and speaking with little visible motion happening.
That’s to not say Browning’s directorial efforts are fully fruitless. Dracula does function some fascinating visuals, together with the notable pushed zooms onto Lugosi’s face as Dracula wields his vampiric telepathic powers. These photographs of sunshine throughout his eyes are iconic and have been imitated within the many years since. The huge angle shot of Dracula in his cobweb-filled fortress greeting Renfield instantly conjures environment.
Regardless of being the vampire movie, it funnily options no transformation right into a bat or rat, no chunk marks on a sufferer’s neck or flowing of blood, or not one of the darkness one would possibly affiliate with darkish energy of a vampire. It’s a stale rendition of the story in that regard. It options intertitles and silent scenes of newspapers, seeming to bear hallmarks of the silent period in ways in which maintain it again. Dracula is much from a masterpiece, regardless of its well-known nature and Lugosi’s sheer charisma. Nonetheless, it stands above a lot of the remainder of its franchise for the strengths it does have, and it’s only topped by one different movie….
- International Rating: #635
- 2/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 48% of its matchups
- 134 customers have it of their prime 20
The king of the checklist comes out of a really distinctive development in Hollywood within the Thirties. International markets had been already a key a part of the underside line for Hollywood studios within the 20s. As talkies grew to become distinguished, Hollywood confronted the battle of exporting these movies, as they might not merely change the language within the intertitles as they might with silent movies. Hollywood solved this drawback by using the identical units, costumes, and script from their English-language productions, and easily bringing in actors who may converse the mandatory languages. By the top of the 20s, Common was particularly centered on Spanish-language cinema.
For this reason this model of Dracula happened. Whereas it’s ostensibly only a different-language model of the Browning movie, and is usually included as a bonus function on bodily media releases of Dracula, it’s fully its personal expertise. Directed by George Melford as a substitute of Browning, it was filmed at evening when Browning’s crew left for the day, making it actually the creature of the evening.
Perhaps as a result of it was filmed at evening, or perhaps due to Melford’s larger enthusiasm, the ultimate product is superior to the extra well-known model. Melford doesn’t tempo his movie as lackadaisically as Browning’s. He brings scenes to life with a extra enthusiastic and concerned solid. Melford’s digital camera is extra dynamic, shifting amongst the units with extra diversified and fascinating photographs, not content material to easily sit at a large angle as is usually the case in Browning’s movie. This extra creeping strategy lends your complete movie a stronger and sinister environment. Lupita Tovar actually shines as Eva Seward, the movie’s personal riff on the primary love curiosity of the protagonist. She is sultry and tempting, making Dracula’s pursuit of her tackle a darker, extra sexual undertone.
That’s to not say it compares favorably in each facet. Regardless of the general higher cinematography, there’s arguably no shot as iconic as Browning’s close-ups of Lugosi’s eyes. Actually, this movie’s makes an attempt at replicating these photographs underscores the most important detriment: no Bela Lugosi. Whereas Carlos Villarias‘ tackle Dracula isn’t horrible, it additionally isn’t significantly robust. In using the road between over-acting and powerful presence, Villarias falls over it and comes throughout as moderately hokey, like a comedy movie’s model of Dracula. He’s onerous to take severely as a menacing menace, particularly once you examine him to the pure gravitas of Lugosi. These close-ups of Villarias’s eyes as he makes use of his psychic powers lack the mystique of the English model.
Whilst you do lose Lugosi, Dracula‘s Spanish model makes up for it in different methods and stands as the most effective Common movie to function Dracula. This movie just isn’t an all-time nice, as Dracula movies are surprisingly a weaker wing of the Common Monsters world. However for the most effective, most moody tackle the fabric, look no farther than this oddity.
- International Rating: #1,741
- 8/100 on Flickchart’s Dracula filter
- Wins 53% of its matchups
- 23 customers have it of their prime 20
Inform us your ideas on the Dracula franchise beneath and rank all of them on Flickchart!
HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
